 |
|
 |
| |
| Author |
Message |
qiandaye622
Age: 32
Joined: 08 Jun 2012
Posts: 24
|
|
I have the two drivers of golf clubs sets, but I think there are some differnces. The SuperFast 2.0 looks larger than the 2010 SuperFast; it looks big enough to actually make the 46.5” length seem normal.
The 2.0 felt solid and very stable on center strikes. The 2.0 handles mis-hits fairly well, but on toe and heel hits I didn’t notice any difference compared to the 2010 SuperFast. On the launch monitor off center hits generated roughly the same numbers from old to new and no noticeable difference in distance or spin rates for me.
Build-Quality and Aerodynamics – TaylorMade seems to have tried its level best to ensure that the taylormade superfast 2.0 recorded the lowest possible weight. It has been dubbed the featherweight champion by independent reviews, which is understandable, with a weight of 279 grams. This makes the Superfast 2.0 driver the lightest in the series. Also, the longer driver shaft works well with the light weight to generate a faster swing speed giving more power to the drive. TaylorMade has also worked well on the aerodynamics of the Superfast 2.0 with a streamlined club head and shaft to ensure greater resistance and lower drag.
The Superfast 2.0 series has been carefully designed by Taylormade to offer greater distance with lesser input of power. It does well in meeting its objective while at the same time offering the golf enthusiast greater stability, lower revolutions, and lower drag.
All in all, I love the taylormade superfast 2.0 driver deeply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
    |
|
wts30286
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 45130
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
